Sunday, August 5, 2012

Music and Politics


The attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001 at the World Trade Center were a moment of weakness and fear with a response of patriotism; American citizens were in the position in which they must take a stance for who to support, but the decision couldn’t be their own, it had to be in the best interest of the country and if they denied this way of living they would be declared treasonous and were systematically outcast from society. Following the attacks and the declaration of the “War on Terror,” lead singer of the Dixie Chicks, Natalie Maines, exercised this notion of “treason” with a comment expressing her disapproval with the declaration of war and was ashamed to have President Bush from Texas. After Natalie said this, the group was thrown into a political warfare unknowingly and was constantly attacked with accusations of being a treasonous group and experienced dismissal by the groups of people that they were formally accepted and welcomed by, the country population.
               As a result of being entered into a battle the Dixie Chicks had no intention of starting, they experienced the indication of the contemporary political issues going on in their time, being that they had already existed long before Natalie’s comment. During this time in which terror had struck America, political messages in music were interpreted as the real thing, and were determined “true” and were unquestionable. Revenge and patriotism were in the hearts of the Americans and they were ready to support in the time of war. When this concept wasn’t followed by the Dixie Chicks, this caused mass confusion and feelings of betrayal. The group, primarily Natalie, insisted her political believes were her own and that she was merely a performer making conversation with her fans. The war on terror was a sensitive subject and was not viewed as a time by the American people as a time to be bashing their commander and chief. The caliber of criticism on the Dixie Chicks was National and didn’t blow over in a couple of days. Radio stations were threatened on being boycotted by people across America if they continued playing songs by the group days after the comment was made. Radio station after radio station dropped the Dixie Chicks from their playlists and as their fame fell; their infamy began to billow underneath them. The Dixie Chicks were being silenced for expressing their own personal political beliefs. The problem behind that is that the Dixie Chicks rights were being infringed upon. It wasn’t their music which caused such uproar, but it was what they believed outside the frame of music. Three years after, Kanye West was providing a service on national television for the hurricane Katrina relief organizations when he made his infamous blast on George Bush, “George Bush doesn’t care about black people,” A comment arguably even more offensive towards America’s leader. Though the world was shocked at Kanye’s claim, it was quickly swept under the rug and was laughed at by the public. Why can something so serious be a joke and the joke by taken so seriously?
               There are several things to take away from a story like the Dixie Chicks’. An event like the September 11th attacks perpetuated the fact that when stricken by fear and patriotism, the American people will defend what they know, and what they thought they knew was their government had their best interest in mind. The lesson to learn from the “Shut Up and Sing” documentary is that music is used by several organizations as a tool to convey an important message. During the times of the war on terror, our government and people would use songs with revengeful tones as a way to acquire approval for war.  In the most recent Presidential campaigns run by John Mccain and Barrack Obama, the music played was indicative of the kind of message each party wanted to get across. John played songs such as “Born in the USA” by Bruce Springsteen to set a tone of pride for being a United States citizen.  John’s campaign runners were either unaware or unconcerned of the true nature of the song. Springsteen actually requested that Mccain take the song off of the playlist because it wasn’t about American pride, but it was a song following the Vietnam War about the injustice the American soldiers were given because there were no jobs to be filled up, so soldiers were left on the streets. Barrack used music as a way to identify himself with the American people.  Bettye LaVette and Jon Bon Jovi performed "A Change is Gonna Come" by Sam Cook. Performances like this happened all through Barrack Obamas Inaguration, and was meant to show unity and togetherness by performers who normally wouldn’t be performing together. If music is used by such influential people to convey a message of their own, then music doing the opposite can cause turmoil on a career such as Natalie Maines and the Dixie Chicks. When they worked against the voice of “truth,” their careers suffered and they had nothing to do but pick up the pieces and begin to rebuild.
               Music is often taken for granted when looking into its’ influence on societal and political aspects. With repetition, music can shape the way we think and feel and can be the determination on what is true and what is not. The Dixie Chicks’ story illuminated the history and provided an example of contemporary music combating the political range. Taking these lessons into account and learning the effects of music on the world is crucial towards understanding the way our world works as a whole.

No comments:

Post a Comment